Friday, July 23, 2010

NCUA Strikes Back at Arrowhead Critics

Tired of being a pinata for critics over its seizure of Arrowhead Central Credit Union , the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) fired back on July 22 stating that the credit union understated its financial problems and released Arrowhead Central's second quarter financial results.

Critics of NCUA's placing Arrowhead Central into conservatorship on June 25th contend that the credit union was on the mend. David Chatfield, the interim president and CEO of the California and Nevada CU Leagues, told Credit Union Journal (paid subscription) that "NCUA's claim the credit union was in declining financial condition flies in the face of the facts... in this case I see little justification for NCUA doing what it did."

In a highly unusual move, NCUA issued a media release writing that the credit union "had previously posted inaccurate information" distorting its true financial condition. NCUA noted that the prior management failed to comply with methodology approved by the credit union’s external CPA for funding its loan loss reserve accounts. This underfunding of its loan loss allowance account caused the credit union to report a profit of almost $2.6 million as of March 31, 2010. However, when the loan loss allowance account was properly funded, the credit union reported a year-to-date loss of more than $1.4 million at the end of the second quarter.

The press release further states that "NCUA determined that Arrowhead Central’s former management team did not charge off loan losses in a timely or consistent manner, and that historical ratios did not consistently reflect actual losses the credit union was experiencing."

Additionally, NCUA points out that since the middle of 2009 the credit union had failed on four previous attempts to file an acceptable net worth restoration plan.

The press release notes that the credit union has been significantly undercapitalized for four consecutive quarters and as of June 30, 2010, its net worth ratio was 3 percent.

Will the release of this information be enough to quell NCUA's critics over its handling of Arrowhead Central?

I don't know.

No comments:

Post a Comment

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.