Tuesday, June 15, 2010

ABA's Comment on NCUA's Short-term, Small Amount Loan Proposal

The following is what ABA wrote to NCUA on its proposed short-term, small amount loan program.

Dear Ms. Rupp:

The National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) Board is proposing to amend its general lending rule to enable federal credit unions (FCUs) to offer short-term, small amount loans (STS loans) as a viable alternative to payday loans. The proposed amendment would permit FCUs to charge a higher interest rate for an STS loan than is permitted under the general lending rule, but the proposal will impose limitations on the permissible term, amount, and fees associated with an STS loan.

ABA believes this proposed rule points FCUs back toward their basic charter purpose, which many FCUs have largely abandoned. NCUA reported that only 532 FCUs offered micro consumer loans and only 279 FCUs (or 5.9 percent of all FCUs) offered payday loans at the end of 2009. Congress in 1934 created FCUs for the purpose of making “credit for provident and productive purposes more available to people of small means.” The intent of Congress when establishing FCUs was for FCUs to be an alternative to nontraditional financial services providers, such as payday lenders, for people of small means.

NCUA needs to have realistic expectations regarding its STS loan program. Banks that have participated in FDIC’s Small-Dollar Loan Pilot Program Guidelines have found such loans to be in general unprofitable. According to the FDIC, very few banks after the first year in its pilot program have achieved, or expect to achieve, short-term profitability from the small dollar loan program. Instead the program is viewed by some banks as a way to build a long-term relationship, while others viewed it as a vehicle to build community goodwill. Additionally, the delinquency rate for the small dollar loan program was typically higher than that for other consumer loans, at 7.3 percent of loans outstanding, and the charge-off rate was 3.4 percent of loans originated under the pilot. ABA recommends that the NCUA Board conduct consumer research to determine which features of the product are important to potential payday borrowers and survey FCUs that are currently offering payday loans to determine their experience with respect to STS loans.

In conclusion, ABA believes that NCUA’s proposed STS loan program would point FCUs back toward their basic charter purpose of serving people of small means. The Board should conduct consumer research to ensure that its sets realistic expectations regarding this STS Loan program.

Sincerely,

Keith Leggett
Vice President & Senior Economist

No comments:

Post a Comment

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.