Monday, February 13, 2017

Taxi Medallion Lender LOMTO Reports Loss of $18.4 Million, Net Worth Plummets

LOMTO Federal Credit Union (Woodside, NY) reported a loss of almost $18.4 million for the full year of 2016 as problem taxi medallion loans undermined the financial performance of the credit union..

The loss can be attributed to an increase in provisions for loan and lease losses in 2016. The credit union reported provisions for loan and lease losses were almost $16.8 million for 2016.

As a result of the loss, the credit union's net worth plummeted from $32.3 million at the end of 2015 to less than $13.9 million at the end of 2016.

The credit union's net worth ratio was 5.87 percent as of December 31, 2016 -- down from 12.25 percent a year ago and 8.40 percent as of September 30, 2016. This means that LOMTO FCU was undercapitalized at the end of 2016.

The $236 million credit union reported delinquent loans of $30.9 million at the end of 2016 -- up from $30.4 million as of September 2016 and $6.4 million as of December 2015, respectively.

The credit union's delinquency ratio increased during the quarter to 14.36 percent at the end of 2016. In comparison, the delinquency rate was 13.43 percent as of September 2016 and 2.65 percent at the end of 2015.

Also, delinquent loans were more than double the credit union's net worth at 222.86 percent.

In addition, the pipeline of early delinquencies (30 to 59 days past due) grew during the fourth quarter from $7.7 million to $10.9 million.

The credit union saw an surge in net charged off loans during the third quarter. Net charge-offs went from $3.4 million at the end of the third quarter of 2016 to $11.2 million at the end of 2016. As of the end of 2016, the net charge-off rate was 4.90 percent.

During the fourth quarter, troubled debt restructured (TDR) loans fell by almost $10.7 million to $23.1 million at LOMTO FCU. The ratio of TDR loans to total loans was 10.72 percent and the ratio of TDR loans to net worth was 166.46 percent.

The credit union stated that its allowance for loan and lease losses (ALLL) was almost $24.9 million at the end of 2016. As a result, the credit union had a coverage ratio (ALLL to delinquent loans) of 80.41 percent. However, its coverage ratio may be overstated as roughly $8.8 million of ALLL is meant to cover potential losses associated with TDR loans.

Given the deteriorating financial performance of LOMTO FCU, the credit union should be under a formal enforcement order or conservatorship with the National Credit Union Administration.


  1. Quick, we need a white paper from Hampel to tell us we will be getting a rebate on CCU assessments and a NCUSIF Dividend, not assessments.

  2. You expect the NCUA to act quickly. Don't hold your breath. Budget for the NCUA Assessment. CONCENTRATION RISK...NCUA missed it again. NCUA owns CONSTIPATION RISK.

    1. NCUA on behalf of themselves and credit unions, borrowed over $25 BILLION from the taxpayer for multiple supervisory infractions at corporates including CONCENTRATION risk.
      Now, barely done with paying off the taxpayer loan from treasury, NCUA now faces an insurance fund crisis of their own making due to OVER CONCENTRATION of medallion loans (70% of total assets, unbelievable).
      How did NCUA miss this?
      How did CUNA miss this (and now Hampel releases another idiotic white paper saying assessments aren't needed AND there should be a NCUSIF Dividend!).
      How did NAFCU miss this?
      So glad we don't pay dues anymore but instead of using the extra money for marketing we have to budget for assessments.
      Who is ncua's boss?
      And what's their excuse?



The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.