Saturday, January 19, 2019

They Have Expensive Taste

The Washington Post is reporting on the expensive taste of National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) Chairman J. Mark McWatters and his chief of staff Sarah Vega.

According to the story, this information would have never seen the light of day except for a whistleblower complaint to the agency's inspector general about the extravagant spending by Mcwatters and Vega.

For example, the agency paid $250 for an UberBlack ride from Washington, D.C. to Alexandria.

The agency has decided that McWatters can no longer use UberBlack, but only regular Uber. This caused McWatters to lament: “I’m schlepping around in somebody’s Civic.”

The article also noted a fondness for wine and top-shelf liquor and pricey meals.

A recently retired assistant inspector general stated that "there was a sense of entitlement."

While these expenditures are lavish, they are permitted by the agency's rules.

As John Kutchey, deputy executive director of the NCUA, explained to agency investigators, "They have expensive taste."

Read the story (subscription required).

3 comments:

  1. Both the article and your post miss some important questions:
    Did McWatters have Vega pay the bill so that he could approve the "out of policy" expenses?
    Why is it necessary for the Chair and chief of staff of a federal regulator to have a business dinner with a lobbyist..and if once perhaps fine but why so many times?
    lobbyists lobby lawmakers (a practice that is ruining our system of government).
    Why are they spending so much money is asked but why so often?
    also, why is the federal regulator buying dinner for a lobbyist and a consultant (fryzel)?
    is that even allowed?
    what was the business discussed that would be related to a safety and soundness regulator?
    why did Vega accept and then withdraw the trade association job?
    was this questionable expense behavior behind her going back to the agency?
    the only reason ncua hasn't been skewered by now is the congress is more dysfunctional than ncua.
    Mr. Leggett, can you shed light or foia any of these questions?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Entitled?
    I'll say!
    anyone driving for Uber/Lyft, anyone driving a civic (or any car like that- millions of Americans and credit union members, anyone taking using uber but not "X", take note...
    ...the chairman and chief of staff of the regulator for non tax paying banks think they're above you.
    and, credit unions approve of them.
    nice!
    nice job congress.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Pigs at the trough. Feed the needy, not the greedy. The federal tax exemption enables the credit unions to pay for these NCUA junkets. Make it a deep pour.

    ReplyDelete

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.